Friday, October 29, 2010

Global Warming IS BUNK!

Oh Alan Caruba. Oh you and your conservatist propaganda, you sincerely leave me speechless...
Caruba believes that Global warming is just a bunch of bull pucky...O yes he does! And he has no legitimate resources to prove it (thus exemplifying the issue of blog legitmacy and factual regergatation)! He claims that environmentalism is fear-driven and I must admit this is a fair statement, because, OF COURSE IT IS! When an asteroid is coming at you at a hundreds of miles an hour or a tidal wave is about to rain down on the parade that is your city, you're going to say "WE NEED TO GET EFFIN' MOVING!". Although the examples above are severely dramaticized Global Warming isn't...although it's happening slowly that DOES NOT mean it isn't happening. Global warming, like a tidal wave, or an asteroid is a destructive force that will and is affecting our planet and “WE NEED TO GET EFFIN MOVIN’!
Caruba believes that Global Warming is a hoax. Sir, have you watched Discovery? I mean really, there is pretty real evidence that ice caps are melting, animals and plants are dying, and the ocean is rising. And I sincerely don't think that alllll the people involved in environmentalism are plotting to take down the government, kill technology, and kill millions, as you say...crazy. You're seriously taking on the roll of those conspiracist liberals you hate so much eh? So what environmentalists want to create clean fuel sources? What’s it to you? If we can get cleaner air, even if you were right about this global warming stuff, why is that a bad thing? O because you say it’s a conspiracy to make food costs rise (because of liberals tendency to want to make food into fuel), because I’m sure all those “pot-smokin’ hippies” want to pay extra for their granola and organic veggies…you got em’ Caruba…really found out their diabolical plan…and in the meantime sound like my senile grandpa and are just as blind as him

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Into The Blogosphere

Was anyone else a little confused about the article for wednesday? The first few pages I understood, but when it started to get into "geographically-bound stories", I became slightly confused. Can anyone possibly explain it to me?